Healthy ageing is one of the major challenges for the European community, as ageing usually introduces health problems and increased healthcare (HC) utilization. Both myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and anemia limit quality of life (QoL) and increase the pressure on HC. MDS is a chronic bone marrow malignancy usually occurring in persons of 70 years or older. Shortages in blood cells, leading to anemia, infections and/or bleeding complications, are typical characteristics of MDS. The majority (75%) of patients with MDS are classified as lower-risk (LR), which is associated with an 8-years loss of life expectancy compared to healthy older population. A considerable number of LR-MDS-patients (estimated 2 million European citizens) remains ‘under diagnosed’ as anemia of the elderly (AoE), due to insufficient awareness of the relevance of a right diagnosis and the reluctance to use bone marrow puncture in elderly. Consequently, these persons do not receive proper care. The MDS-RIGHT project aim has been to address the complex challenges associated with correct diagnosis and treatment of patients with MDS or AoE, using data from the European MDS Registry (EUMDS) and a community-based Dutch population (Lifelines). The main goal was to compare long-term outcomes and costs, as well as approaches to diagnose and to treat elderly with MDS and chronic anemia of unknown cause; to assess (epi)genetic abnormalities; and to develop more effective and safer evidence-based, tailored healthcare interventions (HCI) for these persons, resulting in better treatment compliance and more cost-effective and safer use of HCI.
MDS care is challenging and complex, as MDS is a heterogeneous disorder and most available HCI do not cure MDS, but generally aim to improve the bone marrow function and to restore the numbers of blood cells. The EUMDS registry is ideally suited for comparing the effectiveness of available HCI for this predominantly elderly patient group. The Registry holds longitudinal observational data from more than 2,698 MDS patients with up to 12.5 years follow-up in 16 EU countries and Israel. Comparisons of this ‘real life’ data helped to identify the most (cost-)effective treatment strategies. MDS-RIGHT objectives were:
1 Comparing outcome and costs of existing HCI using data from the comprehensive EUMDS Registry
2 Enhancing compliance with diagnostic procedures in MDS, by introducing new diagnostic methods
3 Maximizing QoL by restricting MDS-specific HCI to patients with the right diagnosis, who are likely to benefit from these HCI
4 Providing models that can better predict the likely response of a patient to a certain treatment (‘treatment-outcome prediction models’), to support personalized decision making and robust economic analyses
5 Developing improved, evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, based on the outcomes of objectives 1-4
6 Establishing a European MDS competence network encompassing all stakeholders for dissemination and utilization of up-to-date, evidence-based and regulatory guidance.