A quantitative survey of nationwide incubators and accelerators in Argentina and Brazil was conducted. This survey contributed to having an updated mapping of these experiences. Through the results of the online survey, it was possible to identify the main characteristics of the incubators present, type, legal form, services offered to incubatees, number of projects incubated and type, local ecosystem of reference, role of the university, number of employees. In this regard, an in-depth study was carried out on the relationship between gender and organizational characteristics.
In Argentina, 91 incubators were found to be active, distributed mainly in the Pampeana regions for 40.0% and in the Buenos Aires Metropolitan Area (AMBA) for 36.4%. Other regions also have experiences with the following percentages: Cuyo and Northwest both with 6.8%; North - East and Patagonia both with 4.5%.
In Brazil, 186 active incubators were identified, with a prevalent distribution in the Southern regions of 37.7 percent and 32.5 for the Southeast; 20.8 in the Northeast, 5.2 percent in the Central West and 3.9 percent in the North.
Following the quantitative research, qualitative research was undertaken. The methodologies and techniques used were semi-structured interviews, focus groups, shadowing and participant observation. This made it possible to identify the characteristics of local contexts and networks that are capable of generating social, solidarity and popular economy projects.
Four social incubator cases were identified, specifically two in Argentina and two in Brazil. The case studies investigated were particularly interesting for the innovative incubation model adopted, the activities proposed and the type of projects supported.
The relevant aspect appears to be the ecosystem model adopted, with particular reference to the role of the actors (public and private) involved. The process innovations that emerge from the Brazilian and Argentine experiences concern the ability to involve other actors from the perspective of Open Innovation.
In this way, in both urban and rural contexts, it is possible to trigger projects that promote decent work and economic growth, social inclusion, and projects capable of reducing inequalities, aiming at environmental protection, and responsible consumption and production, the creation of social enterprises and cooperative forms of work.