Research Objective: Enhance the implementation of CITES by investigating EU trends in the seizure of CITES-listed species used for medicinal purposes
The work undertaken in relation to this Research Objective began with an exploration of the structure, effectiveness, and challenges of CITES. Our study uncovered the common threads between Japan’s withdrawal from the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in 2019 and the current threat being made by ten Southern African Development Community (SADC) countries to withdraw from the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). These are: changing organizational ethos, polarization amongst members, influence of non-state actors, and loss of decidability for dissenting nations. We were able to take critical lessons from Japan’s IWC withdrawal to propose various options for much-needed structural reforms in CITES to restore decidability, enable equitability, and implement inclusive decision-making. Further work undertaken as part of WP2 in relation to this Research Objective involved accessing and analyzing data from the EU Trade in Wildlife Information Exchange (EU-TWIX) database to investigate European trends in seizures of medicinal wildlife products against the backdrop of rising complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use. Preliminary analysis showed that total annual seizures of medicinal wildlife contraband in Europe trended upwards from 2005-2018, though dropped to below half of peak levels during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further international collaborative work related to this Research Objective is ongoing to examine penalty disparities between wildlife and drug trafficking across 19 national jurisdictions in East and Southeast Asia, a major hotspot for wildlife trade with significant trade route linkages to and from the EU.
Research Objective: Investigate the implications of escalating geopolitical tensions in the Asia-Pacific region on global wildlife trade to improve global environmental governance
We first examined how complex social factors in an era of renewed great-power politics, particularly given the state of the intensifying US-China rivalry, has direct implications for environmental governance and biodiversity outcomes. Through international collaboration, our research activities explored the four mechanisms – competition, coercion, learning and emulation – of the classic model of policy diffusion theory in the context of environmental policymaking. We explored a case study for each mechanism to illustrate how it can benefit biodiversity conservation, and point to examples of relevant policies and actions that could improve outcomes. Further work in relation to this Research Objective built upon existing studies on institutional change and negotiation strategy to highlight two aspects of a venue-linking framework in China's approach to sea cucumber management, including the institutional settings enabling countries to deploy such a strategy in environmental negotiations and the actors’ capacity to seize the opportunity. This study offered new empirical insights into how China navigates the complex political dynamics in global environmental governance when multiple policy venues with overlapping jurisdictions are involved. Further international collaborative work was also undertaken to define frontiers in the emerging field of conservation geopolitics and build interdisciplinary partnerships to support conservation through an exploration of the ecological implications of demilitarized zones (DMZ).