This project was mainly focused on the mechanisms of allergic shock reactions (also known as anaphylaxis), and the role of IgG antibodies and myeloid cells in these reactions. Conflicting results have been obtained regarding the roles of antibody receptors and effector cells in models of anaphylaxis. In part, this might reflect the choice of adjuvant used during sensitization because various adjuvants might differentially influence the production of particular antibody isotypes. We thus decided to develop an "adjuvant-free" mouse model of anaphylaxis and assess the pathways of anaphylaxis in this model. We found that anaphylaxis is reduced in mice lacking the IgE receptor FcεRI, the IgG receptor FcγRIII or the common γ-chain FcRγ. Depletion of monocytes/macrophages also reduced anaphylaxis. By contrast, depletion of neutrophils or basophils had no significant effects in this model. Anaphylaxis was dependent on platelet-activating factor and histamine and was reduced in two types of mast cell (MC)-deficient mice. Finally, engraftment of MC-deficient mice with bone marrow-derived cultured MCs significantly exacerbated the hypothermia response and restored inflammation to levels similar to those observed in wild-type mice. We thus demonstrated that MCs, monocytes/macrophages and IgG antibodies play key roles in this model of anaphylaxis. These results were published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Balbino et al. 2017).
We then demonstrated that each subclass of mouse IgG (IgG1, IgG2a, or IgG2b) can induce anaphylaxis using passive models. We then sought to determine which pathways control the induction of IgG1-, IgG2a-, and IgG2b-dependent anaphylaxis.
We found that the activating FcγRIII is the receptor primarily responsible for all 3 models of anaphylaxis, and subsequent downregulation of this receptor was observed. These models differentially relied on histamine release and the contribution of mast cells, basophils, macrophages, and neutrophils. Strikingly, basophil contribution and histamine predominance in mice with IgG1- and IgG2b-induced anaphylaxis correlated with the ability of inhibitory FcγRIIB to negatively regulate these models of anaphylaxis.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that the differential expression of inhibitory FcγRIIB on myeloid cells and its differential binding of IgG subclasses controls the contributions of mast cells, basophils, neutrophils, and macrophages to IgG subclass-dependent anaphylaxis. Collectively, our results unravel novel complexities in the involvement and regulation of cell populations in IgG-dependent reactions in vivo. These results were published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Beutier et al. 2017).
We then established and characterized mice humanized for IgG receptors, in order to study the role of human IgG antibodies in food-induced anaphylaxis. We confirmed that the expression profile of these receptors is similar of that observed in human cells. We also showed that these receptors are functional since human IgG can activate these receptors in vivo. We have now also demonstrated that anaphylaxis can be induced in these humanized mice upon sensitization with purified IgG from peanut allergic patients and challenge with peanut extract, thus demonstrating that human IgG can induce anaphylaxis. We are now preparing a manuscript to report these findings, and are assessing the role of IgG produced during oral immunotherapy.