I. Patterns in CCA behavior
Our meta-analysis of surveys on household CCA found a Global North bias in data, and statistically significant relationships between drivers of private CCA and Hofstede cultural rankings (Noll et al., 2020). We ran 5 survey waves in 4 countries (US, NL, CN, ID), with the 5th country (UK) added in wave5. Our longitudinal surveys elicit household CCA (18 on-site actions, insurance, relocation), theory-grounded CCA drivers, self-assessed resilience, place attachment, socio-economic and damage data. Our survey analysis covers household perceptions and behavior (Noll et al., 2021; Noll et al., 2022; Noll et al., 2023). Our Nature Climate Change article was highlighted on Dutch National Television. The questionnaires & the survey data batch are Open Access:
1841 downloads(odnośnik otworzy się w nowym oknie).
II. Agent-based model
Following our review of flood ABMs (Taberna et al; 2020), we developed the Climate-economy Regional Agent-Based (CRAB) model to trace the interplay between climate shocks and agglomeration dynamics of heterogeneous firms & households (Taberna et al 2022A; Taberna et al 2022B). We linked CRAB with our surveys to analyze (i) inequality and regional impacts of household CCA along a gradient of rationality – from perfect-optimizers to empirical behavior (Taberna et al., 2023A); and (ii) synergies of public-private CCA (Taberna et al., 2023B). We analyzed firms' data on CCA investments in 137 sectors in 5 regions (Taberna et al., Under Submission).
III. Macro-economic damages & private CCA
Our team assessed indirect impacts of SLR at sector-region resolution (Cortés Arbués et al., 2024), supporting local CCA needs. The analysis raised media attention (by 57 international newspapers) and was acknowledged with the University Best Paper award. Additionally, we have analyzed trends in private firms CCA in EU27&UK, and assessed the impact of public CCA spending on these private investments (Cortés Arbués et al., Under Submission). Our results show uneven investment in CCA across economic sectors and countries, and elicit that public investments in adaptation encourage autonomous firms CCA.
IV. Coupling micro and macro
To assess the economy-wide effects of CCA behavior of households & firms and distributional flood impacts, we couple ABM (CRAB) with CGE (EU-EMS). By linking ABM (individual-NUTS2) with CGE (EU-world) we find significant differences in GDP, sectoral dynamics, and distributional impacts when compared to CGE alone. This coupling enhances the assessment of CCA policies by capturing both large-scale economic impacts and private CCA (Chatzivasileiadis et al, Under Submission). We organized a Workshop on Micro-Macro Model Integration for Climate Policy, with experts from 3 siloed communities (ABM, CGE, IAM), resulting in the PNAS Perspective (Filatova, et al, Under Review).
V. Scalability and Modularity
The ABM code was improved for efficiency, scalability, flexibility, and reusability. We set up an Open Access platform for sharing peer-reviewed reusable blocks for ABM that supports the international movement:
https://www.agentblocks.org/(odnośnik otworzy się w nowym oknie)VI. Education
Besides PhD education, 12 MSc students linked their thesis projects to the ideas, data, and models our ERC Team develops.