Reconstructing Democracy in Times of Crisis: A Voter-Centred Perspective

Rezultaty

D3.6

Consortium Meeting and open workshop in Bucharest

D2.4

Leiden communication and dissemination workshop

D7.1

Project website

D7.8

Workshop for preparation of edited volume contributions

D7.10

Paris Conference on VoterCentric Perspectives on Electoral Democracy

D1.3

Workshop in Paris, to create awareness and attract partners for REDEM

D5.4

Consortium Meeting and policyevaluation workshop in Manchester

D7.9

Final Consortium Meeting in Paris

D6.5

Consortium meeting and policy evaluation workshop in Barcelona

D4.5

Consortium Meeting in Genoa and consortium workshop

D7.12

Workshop on Migration Inequality and Populism in Stockholm

D6.1

Educational materials to prepare children as future voters

D6.2

Report on the use of the educational materials in sample classrooms in Italy and Romania

D2.2

Data and Knowledge libraries for each thematic working group

D7.2

Publication and contribution repository and participation list reflecting dissemination of project activities and outcomes

D7.4

Targeted publications enabling electoral agencies commissions and thinktanks to use the findings and outcomes of the project

D4.4

Specifications for the interactive gamebased voting simulations for WP6

D7.11

Assessment report of the effectiveness of REDEMs promotion and coordination activities

D5.2

Synthesis of the evidence on factors that motivate and assist electoral participation by citizens

D4.2

Document describing the conflicts of duty and prudence characteristic of particular electoral institutions in democracies

D4.1

Document describing the conflicts of duty and prudence characteristic of democratic elections in general

D8.5

Financial reportsM18 M36

D8.2

Project Plan

D5.1

Synthetic document comparing opportunities for citizen participation in the organisation and monitoring of elections in Europe

D8.3

Bi-annual progress reportsM6, M12, M18, M24, M30, M36

D3.2

Synthesis document on ethically relevant dimensions of different election types

D3.5

Document contrasting the votercentred perspective and alternative approaches to electoral democracy

D3.1

Synthesis document of democratic political systems and institutions in Europe

D5.3

Document assessing policy outcomes for electoral participation at local national and European levels

D7.5

Summary of identified opportunities for deploying voting elearning materials

D7.3

Summary of identified opportunities for project outcome exploitation

D1.1

Detailed map of identified partners and resources that will contribute to the project

D2.3

Country and regionspecific knowledgedatabases

D7.6

Report of the dissemination activities of REDEM at the Biennale Democrazia in Turin

D2.1

Comprehensive synthesis and evaluation of the literature and the relevant European Grants eg ERANET

D5.5

Report on outcome of panel titled Voter Alienation Voter Participation and Social Inequality Breaking a Vicious Circle at Mancept

D8.4

Final project report

D1.2

Description of clustering of thematic working parties and the allocation of responsibilities within them

D4.3

Document describing any differences in frequency and intensity of the ethical conflicts faced by less privileged citizens as compared to more privileged ones

D3.4

Synthesis document on the specific conditions facing European democracies individually and collectively

D3.3

Synthesis document on different philosophical conceptions of democracy

D6.4

Prototypes of interactive game-based electoral scenarios

D6.3

Prototypes of online educational materials

Publikacje

Should we hold elections during a pandemic?

Autorzy: Volacu, Alexandru
Opublikowane w: Political Philosophy in a Pandemic. Routes to a More Just Future, 2021, Strona(/y) 137-152
Wydawca: Bloomsbury Academic

Wyszukiwanie danych OpenAIRE...

Rezultaty

Publikacje

Udostępnij tę stronę

Pobierz