In sum, after conducting scientific research across seven work packages in the period between December 2020 to June 2024, RESPOND has generated results across a variety of domains that address the objectives above.
Across studies and meta-analyses focused on the mental health consequences of the pandemic by RESPOND partners, a small but significant increase in self-reported mental health problems since the pandemic started have been reported. In addition to the known risk group of women, other risk groups for adverse mental health consequences during the pandemic were younger people, and people with a refugee or migrant background. People with pre-existing mental disorders did not present an increased risk, and suicide rates in Sweden did not increase. However, they were at a higher risk for COVID-19 related mortality in Spain. Men with mental health difficulties, particularly those with lower educational levels reported lower levels of adherence to the COVID-19 public health measures.
RESPOND partners implemented a two-step intervention based on World Health Organization (WHO)-developed strategies adapted for remote delivery to health and care workers and refugee and migrant populations with increased levels of distress: Doing What Matters in Times of Stress (DWM) and Problem Management Plus (PM+).
Results among healthcare workers with increased levels of distress in Spain, showed significant reductions in symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder. Further, results in people with a refugee or migrant background from Italy showed that the stepped-care DWM/PM+ program effectively reduced anxiety and depression symptoms in participants compared to the control group. Preliminary positive findings for the stepped-care DWM/PM+ program were also found for people with unstable housing in France, and Polish labour migrants in the Netherlands. In Belgium, a qualitative study among health workers in nursing homes for older people showed that participants in the DWM/ PM+ reported positive implementation outcomes in terms of appropriateness of the intervention. However, several organisational barriers that were identified, highlighted the need for strategies to improve program accessibility, acceptability, and feasibility for healthcare workers in crisis contexts.
This demonstrates the effectiveness of brief stepped-care psychological interventions in mitigating psychological distress during periods of crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, including health care workers and refugee and migrant populations.