Protecting Minds: The Right to Mental Integrity and The Ethics of Arational Influence

Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity

Autori: Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg
Pubblicato in: Neurolaw: Ways forward for Neuroscience, Justice & Security, 2021, Pagina/e 179-201, ISBN 978-3-030-69279-7
Editore: Springer Nature

Persuasive technologies and the right to mental liberty: The ‘smart’ rehabilitation of criminal offenders

Autori: Sjors Ligthart, G Meynen, Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Cambridge Handbook of Life Science, Information Technology and Human Rights, Numero forthcoming, 2022
Editore: Cambridge University Press

Learning to Discriminate: The Perfect Proxy Problem in Artificially Intelligent Criminal Sentencing

Autori: Benjamin Davies, Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Principled Sentencing and Artificial Intelligence, Numero forthcoming, 2023
Editore: Oxford University Press

(When) Is Adblocking Wrongful?

Autori: Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Oxford Handbook of Digital Ethics, 2022
Editore: Oxford University Press

Technology to Prevent Criminal Behaviour

Autori: Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Future Morality, Numero forthcoming (September 2021), 2021
Editore: Oxford University Press

The Right to Mental Integrity and the Ethics of Mental Interference

Autori: Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: 2023
Editore: Oxford University Press

Historical Moral Responsibility and Manipulation via Deletion

Autori: Gabriel De Marco
Pubblicato in: Erkenntnis, Numero Online first 6 May 2021, 2021, ISSN 0165-0106
Editore: Reidel
DOI: 10.1007/s10670-021-00409-6

Healthcare, Responsibility and Golden Opportunities

Autori: Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas, Julian Savulescu
Pubblicato in: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Numero Vol: 24, 2021, Pagina/e 817–831, ISSN 1386-2820
Editore: Kluwer Academic Publishers
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-021-10208-1

Manipulation, Machine Induction, and Bypassing

Autori: Gabriel De Marco
Pubblicato in: Philosophical Studies, 2022, ISSN 0031-8116
Editore: Kluwer Academic Publishers
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-022-01906-2

A Multidisciplinary Analysis

Autori: Ligthart, Sjors; Bublitz, Christoph; Douglas, Thomas; Forsberg, Lisa; Meynen, Gerben; Forensische psychiatrie / psychologie; UCALL / Aansprakelijkheid en verantwoordelijkheid
Pubblicato in: Human Rights Law Review, 2022, ISSN 1461-7781
Editore: Oxford University Press
DOI: 10.1093/hrlr/ngac028

Nudge Transparency Is Not Required for Nudge Resistibility

Autori: Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Ergo, 2022, ISSN 2330-4014
Editore: Michigan Publishing

Compulsory medical intervention versus external constraint in pandemic control

Autori: Thomas Douglas, Lisa Forsberg, Jonathan Pugh
Pubblicato in: Journal of Medical Ethics, Numero forthcoming, 2020, Pagina/e medethics-2020-106435, ISSN 0306-6800
Editore: BMJ Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106435

Closed-Loop Brain Devices in Offender Rehabilitation: Autonomy, Human Rights, and Accountability

Autori: Sjors Ligthart, T Kooijmans, Thomas Douglas, G Meynen
Pubblicato in: Cambridge Quarterly of Health Care Ethics, Numero Vol: 30(4), 2021, Pagina/e 669-680, ISSN 0963-1801
Editore: Cambridge University Press
DOI: 10.1017/s0963180121000141

If Nudges Treat their Targets as Rational Agents, Nonconsensual Neurointerventions Can Too

Autori: Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Numero Vol: 25, 2022, Pagina/e 369-384, ISSN 1386-2820
Editore: Kluwer Academic Publishers
DOI: 10.1007/s10677-022-10285-w

Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges

Autori: Sjors Ligthart, Thomas Douglas, Christoph Bublitz, Tijs Kooijmans, Gerben Meynen
Pubblicato in: Neuroethics, Numero Online first 20 June 2020, 2020, ISSN 1874-5490
Editore: Springer Science Business Media
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4

The Expressivist Objection to Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives

Autori: Gabriel De Marco, Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Criminal Law and Philosophy, Numero Online first 9 April 2021, 2021, ISSN 1871-9791
Editore: Springer Verlag
DOI: 10.1007/s11572-021-09566-9

Nonconsensual neurocorrectives, bypassing, and free action

Autori: Gabriel De Marco
Pubblicato in: Philosophical Studies, Numero 179, 2022, Pagina/e 1953-1972, ISSN 0031-8116
Editore: Kluwer Academic Publishers
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-021-01740-y

Pragmatic argument for an acceptance-refusal asymmetry in competence requirements

Autori: Douglas, T
Pubblicato in: Journal of Medical Ethics, 2022, ISSN 0306-6800
Editore: BMJ Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108662

The Mere Substitution Defence of Nudging Works for Neurointerventions Too

Autori: Thomas Douglas
Pubblicato in: Journal of Applied Philosophy, Numero 39, 2022, Pagina/e 407-420, ISSN 0264-3758
Editore: Carfax Publishing Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/japp.12568

The normative evaluation of neurointerventions in criminal justice: from invasiveness to human rights

Autori: Ligthart, S., Tesink, V., Douglas, T., Forsberg, L. and Meynen, G
Pubblicato in: AJOB Neuroscience, 2022, ISSN 2150-7740
Editore: Taylor and Francis
DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2022.2150714

Pubblicazioni

Condividi questa pagina

Scarica