Food and agricultural value chains often create unequal distributions of costs and benefits among producers, processors, traders, and consumers. This increases global inequality. At the same time, land grabbing threatens the livelihoods of millions of small-scale producers. Reshaping the impacts of agricultural investments, land use, and trade on human well-being is an urgent challenge. Numerous certification systems, such as “Fairtrade”, have been developed in hopes of addressing this challenge. But it is increasingly apparent that many of these systems have only modestly beneficial impacts on people’s well-being. As a result, various companies, communities, and non-profit organizations are testing alternatives like solidarity-economy initiatives or inclusive business models that integrate low-income communities in value chains. Still, empirical studies show that these strategies, too, often fail to improve the well-being of affected communities. This is where the project “Is environmental justice necessary for human well-being? Comparative analysis of certification schemes, inclusive business, and solidarity economy strategies (COMPASS)” comes in. It hypothesizes that environmental justice is a precondition for the success of certification systems, solidarity-economy initiatives, and inclusive business models in effectively enhancing people’s well-being. The project seeks to develop a “compass” to help organize value chains in line with the principles of environmental justice. It systematically investigates the three strategies – certification schemes, solidarity economy, and inclusive business models – in terms of their instruments, effects on people’s well-being, and impacts on the institutional anchoring of environmental justice.
